ChenboLin
01About02Work03Labs04Notes
GET IN TOUCH
Back to engineering work阅读中文版
PRIVACY SYSTEMS6 min read

Private browser chat without a permanent inbox.

Orylin is a one-to-one browser chat built around short-lived invitations, direct WebRTC connections, application-layer encryption and visible fallback states.

Published
2026-08-25
Updated
2026-08-25

Project scope

CURRENT / EXPERIMENTAL PRODUCT

Product and protocol engineering

Session model
Temporary one-to-one invitations
Preferred path
Verified direct WebRTC
Current status
Experimental; not independently security-certified

Topics

Direct WebRTC preferredApplication-layer encryptionVisible transport states
01

A private session without a permanent inbox

Orylin starts from a deliberately small product model: create a temporary invitation, bring one peer into the same session, communicate, and let the session expire or be ended. Accounts, contact discovery and server-side conversation history are not the centre of the design.

The smaller lifecycle makes important state visible. Invitation age, peer authentication, directness and expiry are product concepts rather than invisible infrastructure details.

02

Directness is a user-visible property

The system prefers a verified direct WebRTC path. If that path is unavailable, an explicitly labelled volunteer-browser ciphertext relay may support bounded messaging or file traffic, while the current rescue path is message-only.

Direct, relay and rescue are not synonyms. The interface needs to show which path is active because the path changes latency, availability and the trust story the user is relying on.

03

Application protection is separate from transport

The current runtime uses invitation-bound material to bootstrap an encrypted application channel with directional AES-GCM keys, counters and replay rejection. The Cloudflare edge coordinates sessions but is not intended to become a conversation mailbox or payload store.

That is a concrete current-product boundary. Future post-quantum and media-security designs remain candidate work until their own providers, vectors, browser paths and review gates are complete.

04

Security claims have a version boundary

A privacy product is easier to trust when it says exactly which runtime is being described. Current messaging, bounded file transfer and Direct-only voice are separate from future PQ profiles and from stronger claims about anonymity or traffic analysis.

The engineering lesson is simple: do not let a roadmap diagram silently become a production guarantee.

Public evidence boundary

The current runtime should not be described as PQ1, a continuous ratchet, a global-anonymity system or independent security certification. Direct, volunteer-relay and rescue paths are distinct runtime states and must remain labelled as such.

Each page states what the project covers, what evidence is public and what has not yet been verified.

Browse all engineering work
Chenbo Lin
© 2026 Chenbo Lin. All rights reserved.